"Monoid homomorphism" is an extremely compact way to communicate the concept to someone who already knows some first-year undergrad maths. "Divide and conquer" is more specific and ties in less with what a mathematician already knows about monoids.
"Monoid homomorphism" is an extremely compact way to communicate the concept to someone who already knows some first-year undergrad maths.
This looks like an intentional exaggeration, and I think serves no purpose. I am a math professor now, and my speciality is very algebraic, but I definitely didn't know what a monoid, or even what a homomorphism, was in my first year of undergrad. (I may not even have known what a monoid was in my first year of grad school ….)
Fair enough. I was generalising from the example of myself. (Although I am surprised you didn't know what a homomorphism was. Presumably, therefore, you didn't know what a group was at that time?)
Comments
"Monoid homomorphism" is an extremely compact way to communicate the concept to someone who already knows some first-year undergrad maths. "Divide and conquer" is more specific and ties in less with what a mathematician already knows about monoids.
This looks like an intentional exaggeration, and I think serves no purpose. I am a math professor now, and my speciality is very algebraic, but I definitely didn't know what a monoid, or even what a homomorphism, was in my first year of undergrad. (I may not even have known what a monoid was in my first year of grad school ….)
Fair enough. I was generalising from the example of myself. (Although I am surprised you didn't know what a homomorphism was. Presumably, therefore, you didn't know what a group was at that time?)