well, no; the GP was suggesting the college is charging more in tuition to cover the iPad costs. I couldn't see where they got that info from was all :)
i think you would agree i was saying a little more than i actually wrote.
similarly, i suspect the original poster was saying something along the lines of "every organisation has to deal with finite resources, so spending on one item means less for an another. instead of spending money on ipads they could have reduced fees, or reduced their increase... etc etc".
I don't think you've interpreted his comment correctly - it sounded the poster was making an uncertified direct claim that tuition fees have risen to pay for this. It was getting upvotes so I queried it. :) Apparently this is conjecture - which is cool I just wanted to know.
Comments
well, no; the GP was suggesting the college is charging more in tuition to cover the iPad costs. I couldn't see where they got that info from was all :)
i think you would agree i was saying a little more than i actually wrote.
similarly, i suspect the original poster was saying something along the lines of "every organisation has to deal with finite resources, so spending on one item means less for an another. instead of spending money on ipads they could have reduced fees, or reduced their increase... etc etc".
Hmm, well you do talk in tangents sometimes ;)
I don't think you've interpreted his comment correctly - it sounded the poster was making an uncertified direct claim that tuition fees have risen to pay for this. It was getting upvotes so I queried it. :) Apparently this is conjecture - which is cool I just wanted to know.