DVCS folks like to say that the real enemies are the people still using Subversion, rather than the competing DVCS tools. What they fail to realize is that DVCS fragmentation a big part of the reason people like me continue using Subversion. If there were a clear DVCS winner, I would have switched years ago.
Fortunately, it looks like git is starting to take the lead in this fight. As a result, I've started moving some of my projects over. From what I've seen, git has the best internals. The absence of explicit deltas in the core database is a particularly brilliant move on git's part. In the long run, I hope that wins out over bzr and hg's slightly better user experience. After all, it's much easier to fix user interface problems than to change a tool's core architecture.
Comments
DVCS folks like to say that the real enemies are the people still using Subversion, rather than the competing DVCS tools. What they fail to realize is that DVCS fragmentation a big part of the reason people like me continue using Subversion. If there were a clear DVCS winner, I would have switched years ago.
Fortunately, it looks like git is starting to take the lead in this fight. As a result, I've started moving some of my projects over. From what I've seen, git has the best internals. The absence of explicit deltas in the core database is a particularly brilliant move on git's part. In the long run, I hope that wins out over bzr and hg's slightly better user experience. After all, it's much easier to fix user interface problems than to change a tool's core architecture.