When writing a comment about the blockchain, it's always useful to mentally replace it with the words "distributed database", and see if still makes sense.
"If the goal is to avoid high-frequency trading, why not use a distributed database"? Maybe because that would have absolutely zero impact whatsoever on high-frequency trading?
(Also, the goal isn't really to avoid high-frequency trading, and it's quite likely IEX will create more opportunities for high-frequency trading, not fewer, but that's another matter.)
I place orders on Counterparty a lot, which offers a decentralized asset exchange that settles to the bitcoin blockchain. It would be nice settle stock trades on something like that, slow, too slow, but it would be a nice option.
Comments
If the goal is to avoid high-frequency trading, why not use a blockchain-like technology?
When writing a comment about the blockchain, it's always useful to mentally replace it with the words "distributed database", and see if still makes sense.
"If the goal is to avoid high-frequency trading, why not use a distributed database"? Maybe because that would have absolutely zero impact whatsoever on high-frequency trading?
(Also, the goal isn't really to avoid high-frequency trading, and it's quite likely IEX will create more opportunities for high-frequency trading, not fewer, but that's another matter.)
What specific aspect of blockchain technology?
It's slowness?
The transparency of the consolidated order book?
I place orders on Counterparty a lot, which offers a decentralized asset exchange that settles to the bitcoin blockchain. It would be nice settle stock trades on something like that, slow, too slow, but it would be a nice option.
Not the simplest way to solve the problem. May have many other effects.