Your argument is still circular. What do you think proof and disproof mean in this context? Why don't you think that materialism suffers from the same flaws?
This is why scientists make bad philosophers. They do not acknowledge the boundaries of their philosophy.
Comments
Your argument is still circular. What do you think proof and disproof mean in this context? Why don't you think that materialism suffers from the same flaws?
This is why scientists make bad philosophers. They do not acknowledge the boundaries of their philosophy.
This is the difference between science and scientism.
Science is an extremely powerful and well-proven set of tools for learning about the natural world. Scientism is a crock of baloney.