That would be a different kind of laziness. In one case you're looking at someone, that given a task, actively searches for a way to accomplish it optimally. In the other, it turns out, you're looking at someone completely going around the task, redefining it.
The result is not the same. But if it is interchangeable, that makes for a useful trait indeed. We call it «hacking».
Comments
That would be a different kind of laziness. In one case you're looking at someone, that given a task, actively searches for a way to accomplish it optimally. In the other, it turns out, you're looking at someone completely going around the task, redefining it.
The result is not the same. But if it is interchangeable, that makes for a useful trait indeed. We call it «hacking».