Comment on Content is deadparentComments−dimgl10yI don't think that's the point of the article though. The author is criticizing the rise of bloated webpages with very little good content.−tragic10yOr not so much that, but the practice of putting terrible content up and funding it by selling someone else's soul to the advertising apparatus. And then demanding that you give up that soul, in order to fund "high quality content".
Comments
I don't think that's the point of the article though. The author is criticizing the rise of bloated webpages with very little good content.
Or not so much that, but the practice of putting terrible content up and funding it by selling someone else's soul to the advertising apparatus. And then demanding that you give up that soul, in order to fund "high quality content".