Skip to content

Comment on Raising money for StackOverflowparent

Comments

In this land rush you offer would-be competitors a turnkey solution to compete with you. So hypothetically let's say you were going to get into Automotive or Cooking Q&A and Car & Driver (or Cook's Illustrated) sees you get a little bit of traction and they sign up for StackExchange and heavily promote it faster and probably more effectively than you can since they have a dedicated core audience. This doesn't worry you? Or are you going to avoid verticals you can't quickly get a critical mass in?

Seems like a nice position to be in, actually.

Either you get a successful site in that vertical, or somebody else pays you $50k/year for the right to have it instead.

If this is intentional, that's an interesting idea. Once the concept is out there, it is a lot easier for someone to role their own competition. If there is going to be competition anyway, have some control and/or a stake in success.

If a site gets to the point where it is a substantial business, they may well want to partner with Stackoverflow more closely anyway to get features, advice, access to whatever revenue generating plan they come up with.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.