Comment on Widest Roman PrimeComments−lziest10yI thought 3888 will be wider than 3889 because VIII certainly feels wider than IX but I am not font expert so I don't know−khedoros10yBut it wouldn't be a prime.−lziest10yah missed that. Thanks!
Comments
I thought 3888 will be wider than 3889 because VIII certainly feels wider than IX but I am not font expert so I don't know
But it wouldn't be a prime.
ah missed that. Thanks!