"Of the pages indexed in Google that are of this type of spam in nature, Mahalo accounts for less than .1%"
Huh? I'm not sure which way I stand on this whole mess, but the fact that he makes up a tiny portion of the "spam" doesn't seem relevant? Is a petty thief less bad because he accounts for less than .00001% of theft in the world?
Comments
"Of the pages indexed in Google that are of this type of spam in nature, Mahalo accounts for less than .1%"
Huh? I'm not sure which way I stand on this whole mess, but the fact that he makes up a tiny portion of the "spam" doesn't seem relevant? Is a petty thief less bad because he accounts for less than .00001% of theft in the world?