Comment on Software Copyright and Innovation After Oracle v GoogleComments−Twisell10yIt's also interesting to read the counterpoint arguments of Florian Mueller on his FOSS patents blog.http://www.fosspatents.com/2014/01/api-copyrightability-to-b...The crucial point being that code written for Dalvik is actually not compatible with Java runtime. So how can you argue that borrowing code without consent is good for interoperability... when the product you deliver just break it?−Oletros10yThe same Florian Mueller that never puts a disclaimer saying that he was an Oracle consultant for the case in the Oracle vs Google posts?−Twisell10yThats unfair he put a lot of disclaimers in his post. It's just that they don't appears in the TL/DR that people share afterwards :P
Comments
It's also interesting to read the counterpoint arguments of Florian Mueller on his FOSS patents blog.
http://www.fosspatents.com/2014/01/api-copyrightability-to-b...
The crucial point being that code written for Dalvik is actually not compatible with Java runtime. So how can you argue that borrowing code without consent is good for interoperability... when the product you deliver just break it?
The same Florian Mueller that never puts a disclaimer saying that he was an Oracle consultant for the case in the Oracle vs Google posts?
Thats unfair he put a lot of disclaimers in his post. It's just that they don't appears in the TL/DR that people share afterwards :P