Skip to content

Comment on We need a better way to get to spaceparent

Comments

and you stuck solving the rocket equation again

Yes, but only for 2km/s, so there's that. Also this system can be used on other bodies such as Mars and the Moon.

But yeah, I'm more worried about the 1000g than anything.

2km/s means you are limited to about 20% payload. 20% is 10x better than a normal rocket, but there are actually easier ways to get 20%.

The beamed power method gets about 20%, and works for humans (no g load). Escape Dynamics is trying it: http://escapedynamics.com/edispacelaunch/.

The difficulty here is more technical/scientific than engineering. Synchronizing microwave beams is hard, and if you don't you get destructive interference. I don't know if they have solved that problem yet (there have been a few proposed solutions, we'll see if any work).

Edit: Yes, rail would work great on the moon/mars. Actually there was a movie (Moon, with Sam Rockwell) where fuel is harvested on the moon and shot into orbit. Fun, crazy movie.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.