Skip to content

Comment on Heroku is no longer the hobbyist's friend

Comments

I think it's still pretty friendly to hobbyists (throw up a quick Flask app for a demo, etc), but it's probably no longer very friendly to 'get everything for free'ists (like 24/7 compute, >512MB ram, etc).

The benefit to me of using something like Heroku is not because I get more CPU/RAM than an equivalently priced Linode instance - the value is in not having to manage a Linode instance at all.

I'd also argue that git-pushing to Heroku is still a lot less friction than dealing with docker images or chef/puppet scripts.

Also, once I started accumulating projects on Heroku, I appreciated the consistency across maintaining, managing, and deploying those projects.

Meanwhile every time I'd deploy a new project to Linode, I'd use a different deploy script/strategy as I'd learn slightly better ways of doing it. It's much more annoying to do maintenance on my Linode projects I haven't touched in 6+ months, and it turns out I usually don't have the energy to re-credentialize in the idiosyncrasies of each sideproject, so they languish.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.