People like Catmull of Pixar have tried to write books about this.
Managing creative people - which may include some software people - is not the same as managing a pool of lawyers or accountants.
Software has a problem because too many managers think all software people are interchangeable development units.
In reality there's a universe of psychological difference between corporate biz-logic devs and the kind of creative lunatics who used to work at PARC - and all shadings between the extremes. Put good people in the wrong environment and they'll be worse than useless.
Software has a problem because too many managers think all software people are interchangeable development units.
I've observed that a lot of bad software development managers were previously failed software developers. Perhaps one reason they view us as interchangeable is because developers of that level of quality are indeed interchangeable?
Related to my observation that offshoring can make sense if you note that most corporate development projects fail (not much less than half outright, more than half when you add the "declare victory" messes), and that offshoring is a cheaper way to fail.
Comments
I have always wondered if a TV/Movie director or producer would make a better manager for a software team than an MBA.
People like Catmull of Pixar have tried to write books about this.
Managing creative people - which may include some software people - is not the same as managing a pool of lawyers or accountants.
Software has a problem because too many managers think all software people are interchangeable development units.
In reality there's a universe of psychological difference between corporate biz-logic devs and the kind of creative lunatics who used to work at PARC - and all shadings between the extremes. Put good people in the wrong environment and they'll be worse than useless.
Same for all the other many possible dimensions.
Software has a problem because too many managers think all software people are interchangeable development units.
I've observed that a lot of bad software development managers were previously failed software developers. Perhaps one reason they view us as interchangeable is because developers of that level of quality are indeed interchangeable?
Related to my observation that offshoring can make sense if you note that most corporate development projects fail (not much less than half outright, more than half when you add the "declare victory" messes), and that offshoring is a cheaper way to fail.
Absolutely. Anyone who can ship real things would be superior.
The MBA is basically capitalism's answer to the Soviet "party apparatchik."