I agree with the point that this article makes and think we should be discussing the questions article tries to raise.
However, the article is a poorly written piece of PR. It makes several mathematical errors, mis-represents the study on shopping time, and fails to provide any evidence to back up it's critical point of "e-commerce today acts like a regressive tax".
Comments
I agree with the point that this article makes and think we should be discussing the questions article tries to raise.
However, the article is a poorly written piece of PR. It makes several mathematical errors, mis-represents the study on shopping time, and fails to provide any evidence to back up it's critical point of "e-commerce today acts like a regressive tax".
Why is this crap on HN?