Skip to content

Comment on The double whammy of being poor – making less and getting charged moreparent

Comments

"200-600 dollar smartphone with a 60/month plan"

If I was so poor as to barely afford food I would be living either without a phone or with a $20 shit-phone on a bare bones prepaid plan. Costs hundreds less and gets the same shit done (person-to-person communication)

No, $60/month is the plan with cost of phone included. Please do not put words in my mouth.

If you were poor and unemployed, would you go without a phone, and access to email, LinkedIn and other services while you were looking for work? How do you edit those Word documents or read PDFs?

A smartphone is cheaper than a landline and desktop computer of any variety.

If you really believe that a person can look for work with just a $20 feature-phone, go try it yourself for a month as an actual experience and not a thought experiment!

Ah, the good ol' "if I was poor, I'd be awesome at it!" argument.

Whether or not you're right about how you'd actually behave, it's irrelevant. We can see how poor people actually do behave, and we can look to solutions that work empirically rather than philosophically.

Very good point

A smartphone can be a "shit phone." Besides being a landline replacement, it may be a person's only access to the Internet, email, and more in an age where basic jobs often require applying online.

The $60/m plan with meh smartphone is much cheaper than landline + computer + Internet.

Great points. Do these people have a computer with internet access or do they generally just rely on their phones for business?

Furthermore, I often see the homeless guys in NYC with cheap Dell laptops and Thinkpads using public Wifi to Skype their buddies. So there's that.

Laptop + free wifi is one option. Relying on phone as only computer is another.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.