Skip to content

Comment on Shock in the Shower (1997)parent

Comments

secure as hell too when you are just serving html files.

I'm sorry to inform you that line twelve of that html has a script tag. Here's the kicker: it's google analytics.

I'm not sure that 1996-era HTTP server software was "secure as hell" even if serving static content. Browsers certainly were not.

Super secure, except the information leakage:

    <META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="Microsoft Word 97">
    ...
    <META NAME="Template" CONTENT="C:\PROGRAM FILES\MICROSOFT OFFICE\OFFICE\html.dot">
(Okay, probably not much use now but when this was published, that could maybe have been used to target macro attacks)

but no https

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.