Clustering and storage are completely based on Terracotta, and this is great: relying on a rock solid technology gives you the freedom to focus on more advanced features, such as communication, partitioning, data manipulation and querying.
Which is the same reason Voldemort and Riak rely on third-party storage, or HBase relies on Hadoop.
In fact Terastore is based on Teracotta is one of the most important aspects. This makes us comfortable to see similar performance in numbers related to clustering, storage. Same is true for MemchacheDB, Voldemort and Riak as Sergio mentioned.
Exactly: clustering and storage are more and more "commodity" features, as I see it.
The most important thing is going to be what you build upon them, the real value you provide to the user: is data partitioned or replicated? What data manipulation features are provided? And so on ...
Comments
Clustering and storage are completely based on Terracotta, and this is great: relying on a rock solid technology gives you the freedom to focus on more advanced features, such as communication, partitioning, data manipulation and querying.
Which is the same reason Voldemort and Riak rely on third-party storage, or HBase relies on Hadoop.
In fact Terastore is based on Teracotta is one of the most important aspects. This makes us comfortable to see similar performance in numbers related to clustering, storage. Same is true for MemchacheDB, Voldemort and Riak as Sergio mentioned.
Exactly: clustering and storage are more and more "commodity" features, as I see it. The most important thing is going to be what you build upon them, the real value you provide to the user: is data partitioned or replicated? What data manipulation features are provided? And so on ...