"coach" is already the correct noun for someone who coaches; no "er" is required. There is no such word(!), and no such word is necessary; it sounds like the spontaneous creation of a non-native English speaker (or a native one under four years old).
(If "musicoach" is already taken as a name, that doesn't make "musicoacher" viable. Just like you wouldn't name your presentation software "Powerpointer".)
Don't be a goofball(er?) when naming.
---
! oxforddictionaries.com does list "coacher" as an Australian word denoting "A docile cow or bullock used as a decoy to attract wild cattle."
1 - yes, was an spontaneous word from a non-native English speaker (I'm brazilian)
2 - musicoach.com is not available
Even not being tecnically correct I think most people will understand the meaning, good enough for a side project I think, names can always change right?
Comments
"coach" is already the correct noun for someone who coaches; no "er" is required. There is no such word(!), and no such word is necessary; it sounds like the spontaneous creation of a non-native English speaker (or a native one under four years old).
(If "musicoach" is already taken as a name, that doesn't make "musicoacher" viable. Just like you wouldn't name your presentation software "Powerpointer".)
Don't be a goofball(er?) when naming.
---
! oxforddictionaries.com does list "coacher" as an Australian word denoting "A docile cow or bullock used as a decoy to attract wild cattle."
2 reasons
1 - yes, was an spontaneous word from a non-native English speaker (I'm brazilian) 2 - musicoach.com is not available
Even not being tecnically correct I think most people will understand the meaning, good enough for a side project I think, names can always change right?
also: don't be a goofball(er?) when writing comments
I think that we can settle this with a friendly game of goofball.