That's not really true - Garzik has expressed support for a size increase, just more modest than Gavin and Jeff's. And the only other two committers are against both plans. That's hardly a "majority".
2. Your point is that Jeff "also" is for the blocksize increase? But... but... that's what I said: "Gavin and Jeff are the only two committers in favor."
So... what's your point? What's your math? Your problems go far beyond typos.
Comments
It depends on how you define an "established" dev.
The majority of developers of wallets, for instance, are for the blocksize increase.
But the majority of bitcoin-core developers are against it. Gavin and Jeff are the only bitcoin-core committers in favor.
This is explained in Mike Hearn's blog post, as linked in his email on this post: https://medium.com/@octskyward/why-is-bitcoin-forking-d64731...
That's not really true - Garzik has expressed support for a size increase, just more modest than Gavin and Jeff's. And the only other two committers are against both plans. That's hardly a "majority".
Garzik is Jeff. His name is Jeff Garzik.
These are not two people.
I think you just counted the same person twice because you don't realize he has a first and a last name. ???
That's a typo, I meant Gavin and Mike, not Gavin and Jeff. The point still stands.
Huh?
1. Mike is not a committer. The list of committers is here: https://bitcoin.org/en/development (Wlad, Gavin, Jeff, Greg, and Pieter.)
2. Your point is that Jeff "also" is for the blocksize increase? But... but... that's what I said: "Gavin and Jeff are the only two committers in favor."
So... what's your point? What's your math? Your problems go far beyond typos.