I thought the point of the arc challenge was to say to ruby/rails, smalltalk/seaside, python/django, etc., "hey, look what my language/libraries can do, can yours do this? or better than this?" If the answer is "no, I need to write a new library to do that sort of thing, or rewrite my existing one," then arc beat your language/library at the challenge.
Comments
I thought the point of the arc challenge was to say to ruby/rails, smalltalk/seaside, python/django, etc., "hey, look what my language/libraries can do, can yours do this? or better than this?" If the answer is "no, I need to write a new library to do that sort of thing, or rewrite my existing one," then arc beat your language/library at the challenge.
Doesn't Scheme/Arc fall in the same category? One could view Arc as a Scheme-implemented DSL for web applications, or not?
No; Arc has good libraries for writing web apps, but the basic Arc language is a completely general Lisp.