You can find a natural/evolutionary argument (justification) for just about anything:
Animals don't store food and need to hunt or forage..., so the metabolism is reduced until the first meal to prevent excess consumption of stored fat resources.
Isn't starvation a more plausible danger in nature than dying of overconsumption?
Comments
You can find a natural/evolutionary argument (justification) for just about anything:
Animals don't store food and need to hunt or forage..., so the metabolism is reduced until the first meal to prevent excess consumption of stored fat resources.
Isn't starvation a more plausible danger in nature than dying of overconsumption?