Skip to content

Being a Night Owl May Be Bad for Your Health

mobile.nytimes.com
1 pointyogi1232 comments
On HN

Comments

Like most mass-media writeups of scientific studies, there's no science here. The sample size is absolutely tiny, and it's poorly designed on top of that.

Here are some problems with it:

- The sample size is absolutely insignificant. For studies that we want to generalize to all humans, a sample of at least 100,000 is ideal.

- This is not longitudinal or experimental data. We have no idea if we're just seeing a random correlation or not. There are simply too many variables to control for, especially with such a small population.

- Only people 47 to 59 were studied, and the questionnaire was administered in the present. We don't know what their sleep patterns have been in the past.

- The groups were self-reported, which likely caused problems. What if you're a morning person on weekdays, but not on weekends?

- Correlated health issues, like obesity or diabetes, might be the cause rather than the effect.

- They're presumably all Korean. I don't know how this might influence the study, but it very well might.

Not as bad as obsessing over wellness porn in the popular press.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.