Skip to content

Important BufferBox Update

blog.bufferbox.com
40 pointsaren5555517 comments
On HN

Comments

This is common enough that there's a blog devoted to it: http://ourincrediblejourney.tumblr.com/

I am very disappointed to see this. I have been using BufferBox since the beginning, and it provided immense convenience for both myself, and all of my friends who used the service as well. I was worried that something like this would have happened when they were acquired by Google, and now it has :(

I just wish the team woulda got a boost after the acquisition or immediately wrapped into Google Shopping.

Shopping was the logical place the product would fit, but it seemed like they weren't given much of a boost after the acquisition and they sort of slowed a bit.

Any alternatives out there?

In San Francisco, there's Swapbox. Don't know about in Canada

Billion $ company buys an awesome product -> Billion $ company shuts down the awesome product.

Typical day. Nothing to see here. Move on.

Is there a way (outside of founder stubbornness) to reverse this norm? It's a pity that this has become the trend.

Pay for products. Use companies that have a real business model.

Could the answer be "Charge for products"?

Was BufferBox free? I thought they charged $.

Ostensibly they did, but early on they had so many coupon codes and promotions that I never once actually paid for it. And then it went free for a year after the Google acquisition.

Huh, I only hear of them as they're shutting down; I've wanted something like this in the past. Interestingly the German and Danish postal services have been offering such a service for a while, partly out of a desire to reduce their delivery costs (it reduces the number of packages that have to be lugged out to individual doors).

Germany: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Packstation

Denmark: http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=n&pre...

There's still swapbox, growing fast.

Is this Whatsapp's future? Stay tuned.

Probably not... way too many users. I think fb would take a lesson from Instagram and leave WhatsApp relatively independent. Besides, only an insane person would pay $19 billion for a company just to shut it down :)

$37 million dollars to waste...

well I am assuming that google saw some strategic reason for spending that $.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.