Skip to content

Analysis of Opus 5's 'Contrition'

github.com/curtis-arch
19 pointsslowmovintarget3 comments
On HN

Comments

Interesting. I will try some of of those instructions but I don't mind much about the tics.

My actual complaint: end-of-turn summaries that are undecipherable unless you watched the session closely. Both Opus and Fable regularly ends hours of work with status updates phrased in crystal clear terms like:

  "**V2** debug-helper gate (R4d) | Medium-risk | Gate on `?debug=1` URL param at 3 fixture sites — **not** a localStorage flag (`browser_page` clears it every test). 284 debug-API calls ride the fixture, so R4d goes last+alone"

Bit frustrating. any kind of benchmark or even a few examples showing that this produces better outputs would have been nice.

Does this work? Appreciate honest testimonials from anybody unrelated to the OP or author.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.