I published some of my slop projects on GitHub, and I just added a human written note in the very beginning of README.md that explains what the project is about in a normal human language, acknowledged that the code is 100% LLM written, and suggested to not believe anything written in any of the generated docs below the cut line.
I think leaving a note in a regular README, which is the first thing everyone sees in the repository, is much easier than trying to adapt a non-standard readme file for that purpose.
Comments
I published some of my slop projects on GitHub, and I just added a human written note in the very beginning of README.md that explains what the project is about in a normal human language, acknowledged that the code is 100% LLM written, and suggested to not believe anything written in any of the generated docs below the cut line.
I think leaving a note in a regular README, which is the first thing everyone sees in the repository, is much easier than trying to adapt a non-standard readme file for that purpose.
Does that mean you don't even review it to see if it at least matches your expectations?
Hand made machines were difficult to replicate/repair/reproduce. Mass production (machines building machines) addresses the issue.
The same thing is happening to software. The same resistance is also occurring.