What's in America's Codeboozallen.com 4 pointsnoyesno1 month ago5 commentsSaveHideCopy link On HNComments−nylonstrung1moThe methodology is a joke, this barely qualifies as research−mrbuttons4541moPure FUD−noyesnoOP1moTLDR;”1. Chinese LLMs produce more vulnerable code when prompted with a U.S. government persona than without—and the vulnerabilities are highly obfuscated.2. Chinese LLMs inject PRC-aligned political bias into both the answers and code they generate. ”−JodieBenitez1mowe do not have proof at this point that code flaws are intentionally introduced.−LCRVYSB1moIf it is the way it is (unsecure), what does proof of intent matter?
Comments
The methodology is a joke, this barely qualifies as research
Pure FUD
TLDR;
”1. Chinese LLMs produce more vulnerable code when prompted with a U.S. government persona than without—and the vulnerabilities are highly obfuscated.
2. Chinese LLMs inject PRC-aligned political bias into both the answers and code they generate. ”
If it is the way it is (unsecure), what does proof of intent matter?