Think preprints are unreliable? Analysis of 70000 studies might change your mindnature.com 4 pointsXzetaU82 months ago2 commentsSaveHideCopy link On HNComments−gus_massa2moIt's a very strange article. It's a strawman, the biggest problem is not that preprints that later get accepted and published are bad. The biggest problem is that some "preprints" are so bad that never get published.−XzetaU8OP2mohttps://archive.ph/5UXBX
Comments
It's a very strange article. It's a strawman, the biggest problem is not that preprints that later get accepted and published are bad. The biggest problem is that some "preprints" are so bad that never get published.
https://archive.ph/5UXBX