This is interesting timing. I'm currently using EFS with Fargate for persistent storage and the NFS performance has been the biggest pain point - WAL mode SQLite on EFS works but deploys cause downtime because you can't run two containers writing to the same database file simultaneously.
Curious whether S3 mount points handle concurrent access any better than EFS or if it's the same underlying constraint. S3's consistency model improved mass
Comments
This is interesting timing. I'm currently using EFS with Fargate for persistent storage and the NFS performance has been the biggest pain point - WAL mode SQLite on EFS works but deploys cause downtime because you can't run two containers writing to the same database file simultaneously.
Curious whether S3 mount points handle concurrent access any better than EFS or if it's the same underlying constraint. S3's consistency model improved mass