Well, that's exactly what you would expect from a national broadcaster's post about a technical news anyway. Not sure why it's been posted here, the target audience is obviously completely different.
Thanks. Certainly lots of work seems to have gone into this, but if they had any good results they would be front and centre. Skimming the paper, I can only see model architectural details and some links they try to make to biology. That makes me doubt they actually got anything useful.
Our son ran into the room where the project was running, he looked at the screen, and shouted 'Mommy, it has a brain!' We came to see what was going on - and onscreen we saw a structure that hadn't been set by us, but had grown on its own, actually resembling a brain scan.
Comments
Thin post with marketing fluff and barely more content than its ~5 social media embeds. You can skip this link without missing anything.
Well, that's exactly what you would expect from a national broadcaster's post about a technical news anyway. Not sure why it's been posted here, the target audience is obviously completely different.
Maximum fluff. I will be very surprised if this turns out as anything but a bad attempt at bullshido.
Reminds me of the marketing for a really bad movie:
- “genius” - “the missing link” - “breaks the barrier”
Direct link: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2509.26507
Thanks. Certainly lots of work seems to have gone into this, but if they had any good results they would be front and centre. Skimming the paper, I can only see model architectural details and some links they try to make to biology. That makes me doubt they actually got anything useful.
lmao
Yeah, that was bizarre
Well, after all Poles were co-founders of OpenAI, so maybe another disruption is incoming