Yes, that's bad. Submitters: "Please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize." This is in the site guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.
If you want to say what you think is important about an article, that's fine, but do it by adding a comment to the thread. Then your view will be on a level playing field with everyone else's: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&so...
Comments
[dupe]
More discussion:
OpenAI asks White House for relief from state AI rules
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43352531
Comments moved thither. Thanks!
From https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html > "Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize."
In this case appropriate headline would be: OpenAI’s proposals for the U.S. AI Action Plan.
Yes, that's bad. Submitters: "Please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize." This is in the site guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.
If you want to say what you think is important about an article, that's fine, but do it by adding a comment to the thread. Then your view will be on a level playing field with everyone else's: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&so...
Could this construed as an admission that OpenAI's training may violate copyright law.
If OpenAI is certain it's fair use, then why ask for permission.