I'm glad the reporters did the due-diligence to uncover that they had a prior beef with him. My reading is it appears "evidence" was made-up to get him kicked out a second time. Now the matter is in state court, so it seems like he has a strong case to prove to a disinterested judge or a jury with a functional brain that ChatGPT doesn't leave any form of signature and there's no deterministic method to distinguish human-generated text from that created by an LLM.
Comments
I'm glad the reporters did the due-diligence to uncover that they had a prior beef with him. My reading is it appears "evidence" was made-up to get him kicked out a second time. Now the matter is in state court, so it seems like he has a strong case to prove to a disinterested judge or a jury with a functional brain that ChatGPT doesn't leave any form of signature and there's no deterministic method to distinguish human-generated text from that created by an LLM.