Skip to content

Marc Andreessen says AI model makers are in 'a race to the bottom'

techcrunch.com
5 pointselmar1 comment
On HN

Comments

Andecdote #1: I subscribe to poe.com so that I can pay one fee and have access to many models. I am still trialing a bunch of prompts that help me prepare for class. I am normally okay with Claude 3.5's responses, but sometimes I am unhappy with the output and decide it's worth the extra cost to use GPT-4o. So there is some differentiation between them, and there may still be room for both companies to exist. If I was forced to choose, I'd probably be okay with the cheaper Claude 3.5. Maybe Marc has a point and we'll see some companies fail if they can't differentiate themselves.

Anecdote #2: With image generation models (not LLMs but they are generative AI), there are some models I have learned to avoid with certain prompts. Dall-E 3 won't draw a good picture of Mickey Mouse no matter what- they probably kept Disney properties out of its training set to avoid legal disputes. But Ideogram will make a great picture of Mickey Mouse- so Ideogram has at least one area of differentiation over Dall-E 3, and they might survive the commoditization with that as long as they can sell that difference to people.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.