JWT confirms something is seriously wrong with our understanding of the universelivescience.com 31 pointssmackay2 years ago10 commentsSaveHideCopy link On HNComments−mr_mitm2yDiscussion from four days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39673087−johnea2yDid anyone ever really think we had a correct understanding of the universe?−mckirk2yI thought JavaScript becoming the de-facto standard language for the web even on the back-end had already proven that.−cowmix2yIs this a comment on how one must use Javascript to program the JWST?−mgreenw2yAre we sure they verified the claims in that JSON Web Token?−ironSkillet2yThe article is about how JWT agrees with independent Hubble telescope measurements. Both disagree with a 3rd measurement that theoretically should be in agreement. Therefore, the theory is obviously wrong/incomplete in a measurable way.−bigyikes2yIt matches what we’ve seen from Hubble for some time. JWT verified Hubble.−mgreenw2y‘Twas a joke about JSON Web Tokens _sigh_Note: my original comment said “JWT”−Sirizarry2yIt’s okay, I had a good chuckle−alemanek2yWoosh
Comments
Discussion from four days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39673087
Did anyone ever really think we had a correct understanding of the universe?
I thought JavaScript becoming the de-facto standard language for the web even on the back-end had already proven that.
Is this a comment on how one must use Javascript to program the JWST?
Are we sure they verified the claims in that JSON Web Token?
The article is about how JWT agrees with independent Hubble telescope measurements. Both disagree with a 3rd measurement that theoretically should be in agreement. Therefore, the theory is obviously wrong/incomplete in a measurable way.
It matches what we’ve seen from Hubble for some time. JWT verified Hubble.
‘Twas a joke about JSON Web Tokens _sigh_
Note: my original comment said “JWT”
It’s okay, I had a good chuckle
Woosh