Ask HN: How Does Relativity Apply to Rotational Motion?
I'm trying to get a clearer understanding of how relativity works. While I understand that movement is relative in terms of linear motion, I'm curious about how this applies to rotational motion. Specifically, does the absence of centrifugal force in a system indicate that there is absolutely no rotation occurring? In other words, can we use the lack of centrifugal forces as a definitive sign of non-rotation in absolute terms, or is this concept still subject to relativity?
Comments
In special relativity you can only talk about ‘rest frames’ that are not accelerating. For instance it would say the laws of physics and speed of light, etc. are the same in my rest frame and that of a train going by at a constant speed. It doesn’t apply, however, for an accelerating reference frame and a rotating frame is accelerating and you need general relativity to work it out.
A relevant article on rotational and relativity is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute_rotation
Here's a simplified explanation.
Newton's Bucket is a thought experiment proposed by Isaac Newton, which he used to demonstrate the existence of absolute space. He imagined a bucket filled with water suspended by a cord. If the bucket is twisted, and then released, it begins to spin. As the bucket spins, the water inside it climbs up the sides, forming a concave surface. Newton argued that this change in the water's shape was due to its rotation relative to absolute space. Ernst Mach, a 19th-century physicist and philosopher, offered a different viewpoint. He suggested that instead of absolute space - the bucket can be seen as stationary while the universe is rotating, and the water would also have the same concave surface. This is known as Mach's Principle. According to General Relativity, a rotating universe can actually "drag" the space and time in it, affecting the spacetime of the bucket, so there doesn't need to be any centrifugal forces. This omits the need for any "absolute rotation" or "absolute coordinates".
In Superfluid Quantum Relativities (or Superfluid Quantum Gravity model(s)), the vorticity of the quasiparticle fluid presumably results from the nonlinear [complex] attractor system;
But your question is about whether there can be centrifugal force in a non-rotating system.
There are black holes that aren't rotating.
Godel's dust fluid solutions to Relativity eventually satisfied the prevailing criteria of cosmological expansion and rotation.
Centrifugal force: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrifugal_force
Inertial frame of reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_frame_of_reference
If there are no straight-line paths through spacetime which is necessarily curved if there is mass inertia to describe, aren't most spacetime paths relatively curved and is that rotation?
All transformations in Minkowski space-time are rotations in space-time.
Geodesics in general relativity: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geodesics_in_general_relativit... :
In superfluid spacetime, n-body gravity is most correctly predicted by a fluidic or a dust model with vorticity; which is a like rotation.
/? Vorticity curl: https://www.google.com/search?q=vorticity+curl :
- "Vorticity dynamics" (2016) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/300133454_Vorticity... :