Personally, I am not a fan of these lookma-my-interpreter-in-zero-lines stuff. Take a look at http://norvig.com/lispy.html. Bigger, but well engineered.
Thanks for the feedback guys! I intend to do more interpreter/compiler projects so perhaps you will end up considering one of my future projects sufficiently interesting or exotic :)
I'm not entirely sure this is valid. I'm happy to be shown that I'm wrong, but it doesn't seem to support environments meaning that you couldn't implement define, making it essentially not a scheme interpreter.
I'd be impressed by an actual implementation of R5RS in a small line count, but this just seems to be a calculator with lambda expressions and lists.
Thanks for the feedback. It does support environments - if you check the source code it refers to environments as 'scope'. It is not possible to properly implement lambda without implementing environments.
"I just learned language X, look at how I can fail to implement lisp in more lines of X than the original mccarthy code took to actually implement lisp" really just isn't relevant here.
I'm glad you're learning python. I'm glad you're enjoying it. I'm glad you managed to write something that you think is within spitting distance of lisp with it.
But there's no need to post it to HN. Wait until you've done something actually interesting.
Comments
Personally, I am not a fan of these lookma-my-interpreter-in-zero-lines stuff. Take a look at http://norvig.com/lispy.html. Bigger, but well engineered.
Yes, I'd prefer more exotic stuff like Scheme-to-C compiler written in Prolog or any other combination, not bounded by nbr of lines.
Thanks for the feedback guys! I intend to do more interpreter/compiler projects so perhaps you will end up considering one of my future projects sufficiently interesting or exotic :)
I'm not entirely sure this is valid. I'm happy to be shown that I'm wrong, but it doesn't seem to support environments meaning that you couldn't implement define, making it essentially not a scheme interpreter.
I'd be impressed by an actual implementation of R5RS in a small line count, but this just seems to be a calculator with lambda expressions and lists.
Thanks for the feedback. It does support environments - if you check the source code it refers to environments as 'scope'. It is not possible to properly implement lambda without implementing environments.
"I just learned language X, look at how I can fail to implement lisp in more lines of X than the original mccarthy code took to actually implement lisp" really just isn't relevant here.
I'm glad you're learning python. I'm glad you're enjoying it. I'm glad you managed to write something that you think is within spitting distance of lisp with it.
But there's no need to post it to HN. Wait until you've done something actually interesting.
There is no need to be rude, mst. If people don't consider such submissions interesting, they simply won't vote them up.