Interesting (yet unsurprising) point when you ask an AI tool to depict an assistant that it generally provides female likeness: "Unfortunately, all imaginary assistant characters are depicted as human and primarily female-looking, which can be seen as a gender bias."
bum bum bum the future is here and it's perpetuating biases even further, yippee
Anyways, great work with this walkthrough, it's fun to be a passenger as you go through the explorations with each of the tools and what works well vs what doesn't.
It would be great if GPT-3.5 could remember everything it did as part of this project. So if you ask it a week later, you won't need to clarify the context.
Comments
Interesting (yet unsurprising) point when you ask an AI tool to depict an assistant that it generally provides female likeness: "Unfortunately, all imaginary assistant characters are depicted as human and primarily female-looking, which can be seen as a gender bias."
bum bum bum the future is here and it's perpetuating biases even further, yippee
Anyways, great work with this walkthrough, it's fun to be a passenger as you go through the explorations with each of the tools and what works well vs what doesn't.
It would be great if GPT-3.5 could remember everything it did as part of this project. So if you ask it a week later, you won't need to clarify the context.