Title change? The linked content is fine but the submitted title ("Motto: Unsafe languages allow mostly-safe implementations") doesn't appear anywhere in it.
Yes please. The submitted title is very opinionated (even if it states a derisory opinion that I agree with) and it hides the utility of TFA.
TFA's title is `libcrunch: run-time type- and bounds-checking for C (and maybe other languages...)`, which is plenty useful enough, and also useful enough for me to immediately form an opinion like submitter's.
Comments
Title change? The linked content is fine but the submitted title ("Motto: Unsafe languages allow mostly-safe implementations") doesn't appear anywhere in it.
Yes please. The submitted title is very opinionated (even if it states a derisory opinion that I agree with) and it hides the utility of TFA.
TFA's title is `libcrunch: run-time type- and bounds-checking for C (and maybe other languages...)`, which is plenty useful enough, and also useful enough for me to immediately form an opinion like submitter's.
"libcrunch: run-time type- and bounds-checking for C" seems like a good title.
sorry about the misleading title choice; it’s quoted from the author’s homepage in reference to this work: https://www.humprog.org/~stephen/
also, could be marked [2017]
Thanks for the link!
Considering that "mostly-safe" is just an euphemism for "unsafe", the motto is quite funny if a but tautological.