censorship against spam? plots and terrorist attacks? calls for violence? practicing medicine without a license? child pornography? bigotry? Hate? Lies?
Personally I would punt moderation and labeling to third parties.
let others label the content and then pay people/groups to share they're bulk labels lists. with a mechanism for dispute.
focus on what matters collecting data and selling ads. although a user should be able let specific advertisers sponsor they're content and or buy the content at the advertisers rate.
Comments
censorship against spam? plots and terrorist attacks? calls for violence? practicing medicine without a license? child pornography? bigotry? Hate? Lies?
Personally I would punt moderation and labeling to third parties.
let others label the content and then pay people/groups to share they're bulk labels lists. with a mechanism for dispute.
focus on what matters collecting data and selling ads. although a user should be able let specific advertisers sponsor they're content and or buy the content at the advertisers rate.
The release clearly states: "that people should be able to speak freely on the platform within the bounds of the law."
Your bulk-label idea is definitely interesting.