I know it's not trying to be a focused post, but this short rant is all over the place and not in a useful way.
Right at the end he talks about executions and blanket bans on advertising while recommending an anarcho-capitalist book for its analysis of the 'zookeeper problem'. Do I have to be a much more intimate fan of George Hotz to understand how this is not confused?
If you're concerned about the presence of a virtue-seeking consumerist class, read No Logo instead of someone who endorses praxeology.
Comments
For a much more detailed and introspective writing on the origins of consumption: read David Graeber’s paper:
https://townsendgroups.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/grae...
I know it's not trying to be a focused post, but this short rant is all over the place and not in a useful way.
Right at the end he talks about executions and blanket bans on advertising while recommending an anarcho-capitalist book for its analysis of the 'zookeeper problem'. Do I have to be a much more intimate fan of George Hotz to understand how this is not confused?
If you're concerned about the presence of a virtue-seeking consumerist class, read No Logo instead of someone who endorses praxeology.