This is fun, esoteric programming languages can help you think about things differently, and often change your perspective.
But I think one of the central conceits is wrong? They claim folders take up zero space on disk. I assume they're pulling my leg.
I'm not a Windows expert by any stretch, there are certainly accounting rules that I don't know, but things that persist across reboots and travel with the disk between computers definitely are stored somewhere on the disk.
Comments
This is fun, esoteric programming languages can help you think about things differently, and often change your perspective.
But I think one of the central conceits is wrong? They claim folders take up zero space on disk. I assume they're pulling my leg.
I'm not a Windows expert by any stretch, there are certainly accounting rules that I don't know, but things that persist across reboots and travel with the disk between computers definitely are stored somewhere on the disk.