Skip to content

The Virtues of Monitoring

paperplanes.de
32 pointsroidrage5 comments
On HN

Comments

This is a really good introduction to the different levels of infrastructure monitoring and their various pros/cons.

http://librato.com (full disclosure: I hack there) is a startup with a new kind of entry in the process-level monitoring/management space. Would love any feedback the infrastructure-minded part of the community here might have.

Monitoring is one of the most important thing.

Rule of thumb: Think of everything you wish you had monitored after a crisis has happened (which might be "everything").

the problem is you will probably think of monitoring the stuff that you wished you had monitored only _after_ the crisis happened, people are built in a way that makes it hard for us to think of what may go wrong.

So another simple rule I learned with time is to trust/understand the defaults,plugins,knobs,metrics that come with well known monitoring systems ("why the hell should I monitor _that_?"). This way you use the experience of other people as a backup for your own.

How about starting with the application/business metrics first (as those are presumably easier to articulate). As things fail over time move down the stack (infra/system) to get earlier warnings?

What I have learned: Take Munin (or your solution of choice) and install all plugins for infrastructure to use. It's hard to monitor too much, only too little.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.