This article appears to be doing some Fox Newsy reporting itself. It buries highly relevant information — that Fox didn't do that much worse than other networks — at the end in service of its editorial bent. Its point may be wrong or right, but the way the article is written is just misleading.
Comments
This article appears to be doing some Fox Newsy reporting itself. It buries highly relevant information — that Fox didn't do that much worse than other networks — at the end in service of its editorial bent. Its point may be wrong or right, but the way the article is written is just misleading.