It seems that the pro-https side argues "but it would be confidential against most hackers and also HTTPS!!!" while the anti-https side argues "but a statelevel attacker could still hack it so it's not 100% secure thusly a bad idea".
It would probably help if both sides actually tried to argue and discuss this instead of digging into the trenches and firing potshots at eachother.
Comments
It seems that the pro-https side argues "but it would be confidential against most hackers and also HTTPS!!!" while the anti-https side argues "but a statelevel attacker could still hack it so it's not 100% secure thusly a bad idea".
It would probably help if both sides actually tried to argue and discuss this instead of digging into the trenches and firing potshots at eachother.