Skip to content

A $13B Complaint

novackmedialaw.com
38 pointsgranfalloon4 comments
On HN

Comments

This reads like a law firm trying to trigger the Streisand effect, not sure why I should care

1) We didn't say we are suing JPMorgan. [Huh?]

Why the huh? The author's own point 1 implied the suit was against JP Morgan.

1) JPMorgan already has the document, so there is no element of surprise on the government's side.

Yes the author is asking for the document and believes it should be a non-issue because:

1) JPMorgan already has the document, so there is no element of surprise on the government's side.

To which the DOJ responds:

1) We didn't say we are suing JPMorgan.

Which is a bit of a confusing response.

Headline doesn't need the dollar sign and the word "dollar".

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.