Good shout, although a quick duck search didn't throw anything up for them doing anything long-term related. I was under the impression they have a "newest is best" policy. Happy to be shown differently though.
I'd pay for model 2.0 of this: Send in a picture so they can get your complexion, take some basic measurements, then get a stack of suitable t-shirts and fitting jeans, maybe with a subscription option.
For me preferably with no visible brands and organic cotton, although whether that should be just another option or vital to the branding of the supplier is open for discussion.
Because I already own too much stuff - I'm an average person and like anybody else: About half of the items in my wardrobe never get worn. I'm concerned about labour conditions and the environment - if people buy less new stuff, both will be better off.
To me this feels like a lesser version of what would have been a Uniqlo Steve Jobs turtleneck.
If it was for charity... a maybe, but really? On another note, I've found betabrand to be interesting for this kind of wear although slightly overpriced, though not as bad as this post.
You can now get it for charity - I'm auctioning one pack at: http://www.ebay.de/itm/-/301916911250 and the profits will be donated to Greenpeace (for their "Detox Fashion" campaign) and Clean Clothes Campaign
Background: I've send H&M an enthusiastic email, because I'm concerned about labour conditions and the environment. If people buy less, both will be off better.
"Two pairs of black shirts.
Two pairs of black pants.
One pair of combat boots.
Two pairs of black socks.
One black jacket.
$300 personal burial money."
Comments
scratches head
Is this....for real? I mean...I guess it kinda makes sense?
looks at date
sigh
Rocking an old version of nginx there...
Security, one less thing to think about in the morning?Maybe it's a package from a long term support release. These have backported security fixes.
Good shout, although a quick duck search didn't throw anything up for them doing anything long-term related. I was under the impression they have a "newest is best" policy. Happy to be shown differently though.
Edit: I think this confirms my thinking: https://www.nginx.com/blog/nginx-1-6-1-7-released/
Distros backport security releases: e.g. Ubuntu 12.04 LTS (still supported) has nginx 1.1.19 (http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/nginx-full).
Seems to be fixed
No 500 easily showing, but server still reporting the old version. Are you the creator?
Instagram is also 5XX error... OH WOW!
It's back up now though, strange.
Yeah... That's a big one! Whoops!
It Has Begun. Close your browsers, ye news fiends, an' batter yer shutters, for the Big Wave of Unfunny Jokes is up'n us!
I work from home so I don't really need the pants. It's already got a too complicated.
What's with the hatred? Am I the only one enjoying the 1st of April?
I would not be unhappy if this were actually a thing.
One does not simply go to H&M and buy seven grey t-shirts and a pair of jeans. Oh wait you can :)
I'd pay for model 2.0 of this: Send in a picture so they can get your complexion, take some basic measurements, then get a stack of suitable t-shirts and fitting jeans, maybe with a subscription option.
For me preferably with no visible brands and organic cotton, although whether that should be just another option or vital to the branding of the supplier is open for discussion.
You are not alone
I wrote an enthusiastic email to H&M - and guess what? I'm getting one pack!
I'm auctioning this for charity: http://www.ebay.de/itm/-/301916911250
All proceeds will go to Greenpeace (for their "Detox Fashion" campaign) and Clean Clothes Campaign More info: * http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/campaigns/detox/f... * http://www.cleanclothes.org/
Because I already own too much stuff - I'm an average person and like anybody else: About half of the items in my wardrobe never get worn. I'm concerned about labour conditions and the environment - if people buy less new stuff, both will be better off.
Please see details, bid on and spread the news for: http://www.ebay.de/itm/-/301916911250
Why?
To me this feels like a lesser version of what would have been a Uniqlo Steve Jobs turtleneck.
If it was for charity... a maybe, but really? On another note, I've found betabrand to be interesting for this kind of wear although slightly overpriced, though not as bad as this post.
This reminded me of the markbymarkzuckerberg parody from 2011 (http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/08/07/mark-by-mark-zuckerberg-...)... unfortunately the domain's since been taken over by squatters :(
This site is probably an April Fool's Joke, but Mark Zuckerberg really dresses like this: https://www.facebook.com/zuck/posts/10102616793975691
This better be cheap
Literally, you could buy seven shirt that looks like that for $5 each
Pants you could get for $20
In total if this is more expensive than $55 I hope the profit would go to philanthropy. Especially if they're throwing that word around.
You can now get it for charity - I'm auctioning one pack at: http://www.ebay.de/itm/-/301916911250 and the profits will be donated to Greenpeace (for their "Detox Fashion" campaign) and Clean Clothes Campaign
Background: I've send H&M an enthusiastic email, because I'm concerned about labour conditions and the environment. If people buy less, both will be off better.
So, here's your chance - please see details, bid on and spread the news for: http://www.ebay.de/itm/-/301916911250
It's April 1st, aka April Fools Day
Yeah because if it was real it would include a hoodie.
Added it to the list at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11402947
"Two pairs of black shirts. Two pairs of black pants. One pair of combat boots. Two pairs of black socks. One black jacket. $300 personal burial money."
It's Soylent for your closet
Wouldn't that just be gray coveralls/speedsuits?
Signed up for updates. Hopefully they'll be as amusing as the site
So it begins... I love April Fool's day...
April Fools! (hopefully)
Basic. :)